<?xml version="1.0"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Costs Law Reports</title><link>http://costslawreports.co.uk</link><description>Costs Law Reports provide the only dedicated, authoritative source of costs cases, both civil and criminal, available both in print and online.</description><item><title>Mehta v Howard Kennedy LLP [2026] Costs LR 899</title><description>Bills delivered under the Solicitors Act 1974: whether the bills were interim on account or statutory and whether there had been payment under s 70(4).</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Mehta_v_Howard_Kennedy_LLP_2026_Costs_LR_899_5629</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Mehta_v_Howard_Kennedy_LLP_2026_Costs_LR_899_5629</guid><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 09:42:18 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>The Executors of the Estate of Kenneth Collins v The Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police [2026] Costs LR 883</title><description>Fixed or assessed costs: whether fixed costs or costs to be assessed if not agreed applied upon acceptance of a Part 36 offer, having regard to CPR 26.9(10)(e).</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/The_Executors_of_the_Estate_of_Kenneth_Collins_v_The_Chief_Constable_of_Thames_Valley_Police_2026_Costs_LR_883_5628</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/The_Executors_of_the_Estate_of_Kenneth_Collins_v_The_Chief_Constable_of_Thames_Valley_Police_2026_Costs_LR_883_5628</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 10:04:29 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Timokhin v Timokhina [2026] Costs LR 915</title><description>Part 36: whether an offer to accept the value of the full claim discounted by 9% was a genuine offer.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Timokhin_v_Timokhina_2026_Costs_LR_915_5627</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Timokhin_v_Timokhina_2026_Costs_LR_915_5627</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 16:26:54 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>McGann v Eldonian Community Trust Ltd [2026] Costs LR 843</title><description>Access to Justice Foundation: factors to apply in deciding whether to order a payment to be made to the Foundation where counsel had provided his services free of charge.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/McGann_v_Eldonian_Community_Trust_Ltd_2026_Costs_LR_843_5626</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/McGann_v_Eldonian_Community_Trust_Ltd_2026_Costs_LR_843_5626</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 16:26:38 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Invest Bank PSC v El-Husseini and Others [2026] Costs LR 827</title><description>Application to vary 2022 “costs in the case” orders following Court of Appeal ruling; whether appellate correction altered balance of success; refusal to revisit interlocutory costs; limited indemnity costs for improper allegations.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Invest_Bank_PSC_v_El_Husseini_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_827_5625</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Invest_Bank_PSC_v_El_Husseini_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_827_5625</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 16:01:03 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Rodoy v Optical Express Ltd [2026] Costs LR 879</title><description>Costs of action: where the successful party had claimed indemnity basis costs, a factor to take into account was its failure to entertain the possibility of attempting alternative dispute resolution.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Rodoy_v_Optical_Express_Ltd_2026_Costs_LR_879_5624</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Rodoy_v_Optical_Express_Ltd_2026_Costs_LR_879_5624</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:05:57 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Friend v Friend Media Technology Systems Ltd [2026] Costs LR 817</title><description>Consequential costs orders: appropriate order on an application for summary judgment where the defendant had been the successful party but that success had not been complete.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Friend_v_Friend_Media_Technology_Systems_Ltd_2026_Costs_LR_817_5623</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Friend_v_Friend_Media_Technology_Systems_Ltd_2026_Costs_LR_817_5623</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:05:56 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Lloyds Developments Ltd v Accor Hotel Services UK Ltd [2026] Costs LR 809</title><description>Costs on interlocutory applications under CPR Part 25 and CPR Part 31: whether, on a summary assessment, costs of supervision should be recoverable.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Lloyds_Developments_Ltd_v_Accor_Hotel_Services_UK_Ltd_2026_Costs_LR_809_5622</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Lloyds_Developments_Ltd_v_Accor_Hotel_Services_UK_Ltd_2026_Costs_LR_809_5622</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:05:54 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Cardoso and Others v Salic (UK) Ltd [2026] Costs LR 803</title><description>Costs of action: factors to deploy when making a costs order on the indemnity basis made against the claimants’ solicitors following the striking out of the action.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Cardoso_and_Others_v_Salic_UK_Ltd_2026_Costs_LR_803_5621</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Cardoso_and_Others_v_Salic_UK_Ltd_2026_Costs_LR_803_5621</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:05:52 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Broadfield Law UK LLP (Formerly BDB Pitmans LLP) v Barnes [2026] Costs LR 781</title><description>Contentious business agreements: factors to apply in deciding whether a solicitor's retainer was a contentious business agreement in which case an action to recover unpaid fees was an abuse of the court's process.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Broadfield_Law_UK_LLP_Formerly_BDB_Pitmans_LLP_v_Barnes_2026_Costs_LR_781_5620</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Broadfield_Law_UK_LLP_Formerly_BDB_Pitmans_LLP_v_Barnes_2026_Costs_LR_781_5620</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 12:58:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Thomas Barnes &amp; Sons plc (in Administration) v Blackburn With Darwen Borough Council [2026] Costs LR 765</title><description>Non-party costs orders: factors to apply in deciding whether it was appropriate to make non-party costs orders where the respondents to the litigation were the funders and persons who were substantially to benefit.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Thomas_Barnes_Sons_plc_in_Administration_v_Blackburn_With_Darwen_Borough_Council_2026_Costs_LR_765_5619</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Thomas_Barnes_Sons_plc_in_Administration_v_Blackburn_With_Darwen_Borough_Council_2026_Costs_LR_765_5619</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 12:45:25 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>AstraZeneca AB and Another v Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Europe Ltd and Others [2026] Costs LR 695</title><description>Costs of interim injunctions: whether costs reserved on interim applications should follow the ultimate outcome of the proceedings: that the unsuccessful party should pay the successful party's costs under CPR 44.2(2).</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/AstraZeneca_AB_and_Another_v_Glenmark_Pharmaceuticals_Europe_Ltd_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_695_5618</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/AstraZeneca_AB_and_Another_v_Glenmark_Pharmaceuticals_Europe_Ltd_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_695_5618</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 11:58:25 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>EJW Builders Ltd and Another v Marshall and Others [2026] Costs LR 653</title><description>Assessment under s 194 of the Legal Services Act 2007; London rates where solicitors allocated by charity; reduction of excessive rates and hours; broad brush approach; payment to Access to Justice Foundation.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/EJW_Builders_Ltd_and_Another_v_Marshall_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_653_5617</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/EJW_Builders_Ltd_and_Another_v_Marshall_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_653_5617</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 11:48:01 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Baker Botts (UK) LLP v Carbon Holdings Ltd and Others [2026] Costs LR 519</title><description>Security for costs and summary judgment of solicitor and own client costs: amount of security to be ordered where the Part 20 claimant would be unable to pay the costs if unsuccessful, and whether undisputed invoices should be subject to a common law assessment.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Baker_Botts_UK_LLP_v_Carbon_Holdings_Ltd_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_519_5616</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Baker_Botts_UK_LLP_v_Carbon_Holdings_Ltd_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_519_5616</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 11:21:38 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Cook v Skeggs [2026] Costs LR 491</title><description>Interlocutory costs: whether the court below had been wrong in not having followed the general rule that costs follow the event.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Cook_v_Skeggs_2026_Costs_LR_491_5615</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Cook_v_Skeggs_2026_Costs_LR_491_5615</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 15:32:22 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>The New Lottery Company Ltd and Another v The Gambling Commission and Others [2026] Costs LR 481</title><description>Costs of action on the indemnity basis: factors to consider when ordering indemnity basis costs including whether it was appropriate to “salami slice” the order for costs and whether proportionality was a relevant factor.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/The_New_Lottery_Company_Ltd_and_Another_v_The_Gambling_Commission_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_481_5614</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/The_New_Lottery_Company_Ltd_and_Another_v_The_Gambling_Commission_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_481_5614</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 15:32:09 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Duffy v Birmingham City Council [2026] Costs LR 467</title><description>Detailed assessment proceedings: whether omitting to sign the mandatory certifications on the bill of costs rendered the bill invalid and the proceedings a nullity.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Duffy_v_Birmingham_City_Council_2026_Costs_LR_467_5613</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Duffy_v_Birmingham_City_Council_2026_Costs_LR_467_5613</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 12:53:30 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>The Federal Republic of Nigeria v VR Global Partners LP and Others [2026] Costs LR 425</title><description>Non-party costs orders: whether detailed assessment proceedings should proceed in tandem with applications for non-party costs orders.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/The_Federal_Republic_of_Nigeria_v_VR_Global_Partners_LP_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_425_5612</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/The_Federal_Republic_of_Nigeria_v_VR_Global_Partners_LP_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_425_5612</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 10:09:33 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Município De Mariana and Others v BHP Group (UK) Ltd and Others [2026] Costs LR 443</title><description>Consequentials: factors to apply in deciding the liability costs following a split trial and level of payment on account in very complex litigation.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Município_De_Mariana_and_Others_v_BHP_Group_UK_Ltd_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_443_5611</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Município_De_Mariana_and_Others_v_BHP_Group_UK_Ltd_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_443_5611</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 10:07:55 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Dentons UK and Middle East LLP v Solicitors Regulation Authority Ltd [2026] Costs LR 459</title><description>Consequentials in the Court of Appeal: whether the SRA should pay the costs in the Court of Appeal and below where it had the benefit of a determination of the SDT and challenged it on appeal.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Dentons_UK_and_Middle_East_LLP_v_Solicitors_Regulation_Authority_Ltd_2026_Costs_LR_459_5610</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Dentons_UK_and_Middle_East_LLP_v_Solicitors_Regulation_Authority_Ltd_2026_Costs_LR_459_5610</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 12:37:43 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Limbu and 23 Others v Dyson Technology Ltd and Others [2026] Costs LR 415</title><description>Costs of amendments: proportionate costs to allow where an application to strike out parts of the reply had been pursued aggressively.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Limbu_and_23_Others_v_Dyson_Technology_Ltd_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_415_5609</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Limbu_and_23_Others_v_Dyson_Technology_Ltd_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_415_5609</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 11:58:49 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Attersley v UK Insurance Ltd [2026] Costs LR 395</title><description>Fixed costs: where a Part 36 offer had been made before allocation of a case to a track and accepted after allocation to the multi-track, whether costs were payable on the standard basis up to the date of expiry of the offer, or fixed costs were payable under CPR Part 45.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Attersley_v_UK_Insurance_Ltd_2026_Costs_LR_395_5608</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Attersley_v_UK_Insurance_Ltd_2026_Costs_LR_395_5608</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 15:15:55 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Mazur and Others v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP and Others [2026] Costs LR 309</title><description>Conduct of litigation: whether an unauthorised person could perform tasks which were within the scope of the conduct of litigation within s 12(1) of the Legal Services Act 2007 under supervision by an authorised person.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Mazur_and_Others_v_Charles_Russell_Speechlys_LLP_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_309_5607</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Mazur_and_Others_v_Charles_Russell_Speechlys_LLP_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_309_5607</guid><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 14:44:55 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>CR Construction (UK) Ltd v Barclays Bank plc and Another [2026] Costs LR 383</title><description>Costs of interested parties: factors to apply in deciding whether an intervenor in proceedings for an injunction involving a tripartite contract should be entitled to costs and to a summary assessment.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/CR_Construction_UK_Ltd_v_Barclays_Bank_plc_and_Another_2026_Costs_LR_383_5606</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/CR_Construction_UK_Ltd_v_Barclays_Bank_plc_and_Another_2026_Costs_LR_383_5606</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 15:41:08 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Harrington &amp; Charles Trading Company Ltd (in Liquidation) and Others v Mehta and Others [2026] Costs LR 371</title><description>Security for costs: appropriate order where an application for security had been issued under CPR Part 25 but compromised before the hearing date.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Harrington_Charles_Trading_Company_Ltd_in_Liquidation_and_Others_v_Mehta_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_371_5605</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Harrington_Charles_Trading_Company_Ltd_in_Liquidation_and_Others_v_Mehta_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_371_5605</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 15:41:02 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Various Claimants v Mercedes-Benz Group AG and Others [2026] Costs LR 301</title><description>Costs budgeting: whether there should be a departure from the usual order in costs management hearings that the costs should be in the case.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Various_Claimants_v_Mercedes_Benz_Group_AG_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_301_5604</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Various_Claimants_v_Mercedes_Benz_Group_AG_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_301_5604</guid><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 15:43:16 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Limited Liability Company Air Company Air Manas v GTLK Middle East SPV Three Ltd [2026] Costs LR 293</title><description>Security for costs: appropriate figure to order under CPR Part 25 where the underlying arbitration was reasonably straightforward and did not require the most expensive solicitors on the market to conduct it.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Limited_Liability_Company_Air_Company_Air_Manas_v_GTLK_Middle_East_SPV_Three_Ltd_2026_Costs_LR_293_5603</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Limited_Liability_Company_Air_Company_Air_Manas_v_GTLK_Middle_East_SPV_Three_Ltd_2026_Costs_LR_293_5603</guid><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 21:55:30 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Newmark &amp; Company Real Estate Inc and Another v Newmark Property Consultants Ltd and Another [2026] Costs LR 281</title><description>Costs budgeting: factors to apply in deciding whether there had been significant developments in the litigation justifying variations under CPR 3.18(A).</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Newmark_Company_Real_Estate_Inc_and_Another_v_Newmark_Property_Consultants_Ltd_and_Another_2026_Costs_LR_281_5602</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Newmark_Company_Real_Estate_Inc_and_Another_v_Newmark_Property_Consultants_Ltd_and_Another_2026_Costs_LR_281_5602</guid><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 21:55:16 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Cooper and Others v Ludgate House Ltd [2026] Costs LR 263</title><description>Part 36: whether the costs order should be adjusted where the claim had not been solely about money and the claimants had not succeeded on all the claims.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Cooper_and_Others_v_Ludgate_House_Ltd_2026_Costs_LR_263_5601</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Cooper_and_Others_v_Ludgate_House_Ltd_2026_Costs_LR_263_5601</guid><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 11:41:18 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>National House-Building Council v Hodson Developments Ltd and Others [2026] Costs LR 253</title><description>Costs budgets: whether relief from sanction should be given where one defendant had failed to file and serve a costs budget within the time allowed under CPR 3.13.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/National_House_Building_Council_v_Hodson_Developments_Ltd_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_253_5600</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/National_House_Building_Council_v_Hodson_Developments_Ltd_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_253_5600</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:27:45 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Cubic Transportation Systems Ltd v Transport for London and Others [2026] Costs LR 245</title><description>Costs of interested parties: issues to take into account when deciding whether these should be reserved to the trial judge.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Cubic_Transportation_Systems_Ltd_v_Transport_for_London_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_245_5599</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Cubic_Transportation_Systems_Ltd_v_Transport_for_London_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_245_5599</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:27:38 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Pan-NOx Emissions Group Litigation (Funding Information and Disclosure Hearing 21 November 2025) [2026] Costs LR 239</title><description>Costs following applications for funding information: adequacy of ATE insurance; costs following the event; apportionment by reference to relative success.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Pan_NOx_Emissions_Group_Litigation_Funding_Information_and_Disclosure_Hearing_21_November_2025_2026_Costs_LR_239_5598</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Pan_NOx_Emissions_Group_Litigation_Funding_Information_and_Disclosure_Hearing_21_November_2025_2026_Costs_LR_239_5598</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:27:28 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>