<?xml version="1.0"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Costs Law Reports</title><link>http://costslawreports.co.uk</link><description>Costs Law Reports provide the only dedicated, authoritative source of costs cases, both civil and criminal, available both in print and online.</description><item><title>Limited Liability Company Air Company Air Manas v GTLK Middle East SPV Three Ltd [2026] Costs LR 293</title><description>Security for costs: appropriate figure to order under CPR Part 25 where the underlying arbitration was reasonably straightforward and did not require the most expensive solicitors on the market to conduct it.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Limited_Liability_Company_Air_Company_Air_Manas_v_GTLK_Middle_East_SPV_Three_Ltd_2026_Costs_LR_293_5603</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Limited_Liability_Company_Air_Company_Air_Manas_v_GTLK_Middle_East_SPV_Three_Ltd_2026_Costs_LR_293_5603</guid><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 21:55:30 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Newmark &amp; Company Real Estate Inc and Another v Newmark Property Consultants Ltd and Another [2026] Costs LR 281</title><description>Costs budgeting: factors to apply in deciding whether there had been significant developments in the litigation justifying variations under CPR 3.18(A).</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Newmark_Company_Real_Estate_Inc_and_Another_v_Newmark_Property_Consultants_Ltd_and_Another_2026_Costs_LR_281_5602</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Newmark_Company_Real_Estate_Inc_and_Another_v_Newmark_Property_Consultants_Ltd_and_Another_2026_Costs_LR_281_5602</guid><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 21:55:16 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Cooper and Others v Ludgate House Ltd [2026] Costs LR 263</title><description>Part 36: whether the costs order should be adjusted where the claim had not been solely about money and the claimants had not succeeded on all the claims.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Cooper_and_Others_v_Ludgate_House_Ltd_2026_Costs_LR_263_5601</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Cooper_and_Others_v_Ludgate_House_Ltd_2026_Costs_LR_263_5601</guid><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 11:41:18 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>National House-Building Council v Hodson Developments Ltd and Others [2026] Costs LR 253</title><description>Costs budgets: whether relief from sanction should be given where one defendant had failed to file and serve a costs budget within the time allowed under CPR 3.13.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/National_House_Building_Council_v_Hodson_Developments_Ltd_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_253_5600</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/National_House_Building_Council_v_Hodson_Developments_Ltd_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_253_5600</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:27:45 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Cubic Transportation Systems Ltd v Transport for London and Others [2026] Costs LR 245</title><description>Costs of interested parties: issues to take into account when deciding whether these should be reserved to the trial judge.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Cubic_Transportation_Systems_Ltd_v_Transport_for_London_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_245_5599</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Cubic_Transportation_Systems_Ltd_v_Transport_for_London_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_245_5599</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:27:38 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Pan-NOx Emissions Group Litigation (Funding Information and Disclosure Hearing 21 November 2025) [2026] Costs LR 239</title><description>Costs following applications for funding information: adequacy of ATE insurance; costs following the event; apportionment by reference to relative success.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Pan_NOx_Emissions_Group_Litigation_Funding_Information_and_Disclosure_Hearing_21_November_2025_2026_Costs_LR_239_5598</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Pan_NOx_Emissions_Group_Litigation_Funding_Information_and_Disclosure_Hearing_21_November_2025_2026_Costs_LR_239_5598</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:27:28 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>R (Secretary of State for the Home Department) v Special Immigration Appeals Commission and Others [2025] Costs LR 1977</title><description>Judicial review costs: whether the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) had jurisdiction to order the Secretary of State (SS) to pay costs where the SS had withdrawn a refusal to allow an interested party British citizenship.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/R_Secretary_of_State_for_the_Home_Department_v_Special_Immigration_Appeals_Commission_and_Others_2025_Costs_LR_1977_5596</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/R_Secretary_of_State_for_the_Home_Department_v_Special_Immigration_Appeals_Commission_and_Others_2025_Costs_LR_1977_5596</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 15:51:46 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Matière SAS v ABM Precast Solutions Ltd [2025] Costs LR 1955</title><description>Consequentials: whether the CPR 36.17(4) enhancements including indemnity basis costs should apply to the counterclaim as well as to the claim.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Matière_SAS_v_ABM_Precast_Solutions_Ltd_2025_Costs_LR_1955_5595</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Matière_SAS_v_ABM_Precast_Solutions_Ltd_2025_Costs_LR_1955_5595</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 15:45:26 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Gagliardi v Evolution Capital Management LLC [2026] Costs LR 215</title><description>Part 36 offers: whether judicial reading days counted when calculating the 21-day "relevant period" under the rule.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Gagliardi_v_Evolution_Capital_Management_LLC_2026_Costs_LR_215_5594</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Gagliardi_v_Evolution_Capital_Management_LLC_2026_Costs_LR_215_5594</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 13:26:59 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Motor Insurers' Bureau v Santiago [2026] Costs LR 231</title><description>Interpreter's fees: whether a breakdown of the invoice was required before the court could assess the reasonableness and proportionality of the fee.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Motor_Insurers_Bureau_v_Santiago_2026_Costs_LR_231_5593</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Motor_Insurers_Bureau_v_Santiago_2026_Costs_LR_231_5593</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 13:26:58 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>In re: The Russian Aircraft Litigation – Operator Policy Claims [2026] Costs LR 183</title><description>Discontinuance under CPR Part 38; factors to apply in deciding whether there should be a departure from the presumption under CPR 38.6 that the party discontinuing should pay the costs, and instead there be a Bullock order.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/In_re_The_Russian_Aircraft_Litigation_Operator_Policy_Claims_2026_Costs_LR_183_5591</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/In_re_The_Russian_Aircraft_Litigation_Operator_Policy_Claims_2026_Costs_LR_183_5591</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 14:25:53 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Shufflebotham and Another v Shuff-Wentzel [2026] Costs LR 203</title><description>Executors’ costs: whether executors in a failed action to remove another executor were entitled to an indemnity out of the estate of the deceased in respect of those costs.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Shufflebotham_and_Another_v_Shuff_Wentzel_2026_Costs_LR_203_5592</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Shufflebotham_and_Another_v_Shuff_Wentzel_2026_Costs_LR_203_5592</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 14:26:03 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>R (Public and Commercial Services Union) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] Costs LR 159</title><description>Discontinuance under CPR Part 38; factors to apply when deciding whether to depart from the usual costs order where discontinuance had followed a change of government and the repeal of legislation under judicial review.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/R_Public_and_Commercial_Services_Union_v_The_Secretary_of_State_for_the_Home_Department_2026_Costs_LR_159_5590</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/R_Public_and_Commercial_Services_Union_v_The_Secretary_of_State_for_the_Home_Department_2026_Costs_LR_159_5590</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 14:20:10 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>R (Public and Commercial Services Union) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] Costs LR 179</title><description>Costs schedules for summary assessment: consequences of failing to serve Form N260 where an appeal had been concluded by the Court of Appeal in one day.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/R_Public_and_Commercial_Services_Union_v_The_Secretary_of_State_for_the_Home_Department_2026_Costs_LR_179_5589</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/R_Public_and_Commercial_Services_Union_v_The_Secretary_of_State_for_the_Home_Department_2026_Costs_LR_179_5589</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 14:15:50 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>JSC Commercial Bank Privatbank v Kolomoisky and Others [2026] Costs LR 137</title><description>Consequentials: factors to deploy when deciding the reasonable figure to order as a payment on account in very high value commercial litigation.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/JSC_Commercial_Bank_Privatbank_v_Kolomoisky_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_137_5588</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/JSC_Commercial_Bank_Privatbank_v_Kolomoisky_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_137_5588</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 15:34:24 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Kaur v Kaur and Others [2026] Costs LR 131</title><description>Discontinuance under CPR Part 38: whether the costs consequences should apply where the claimant had resigned from the case without the consent of the other claimants.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Kaur_v_Kaur_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_131_5587</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Kaur_v_Kaur_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_131_5587</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 15:34:06 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Magomedov and Others v TPG Group Holdings (SBS), LP and Others [2025] Costs LR 1933</title><description>Third party funding: following the conclusion of the proceedings, whether orders should be made for the disclosure of the names of litigation funders in advance of the detailed assessment of the costs of the action.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Magomedov_and_Others_v_TPG_Group_Holdings_SBS_LP_and_Others_2025_Costs_LR_1933_5586</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Magomedov_and_Others_v_TPG_Group_Holdings_SBS_LP_and_Others_2025_Costs_LR_1933_5586</guid><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 15:10:32 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Merricks (Class Representative) v Mastercard Inc and Others [2026] Costs LR 101</title><description>Consequentials: appropriate distribution of the settlement pot of £200m between class members, the funder, legal costs and the destination of any unclaimed funds.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Merricks_Class_Representative_v_Mastercard_Inc_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_101_5585</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Merricks_Class_Representative_v_Mastercard_Inc_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_101_5585</guid><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 14:28:08 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Ellis v Ellis and Others [2026] Costs LR 59</title><description>Contentious probate: factors to deploy in determining appropriate costs orders in contentious probate where one executor had remained neutral and the claimant had made a Part 36 offer but had declined an offer to mediate.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Ellis_v_Ellis_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_59_5584</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Ellis_v_Ellis_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_59_5584</guid><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 13:58:33 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Thomas v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2026] Costs LR 125</title><description>Part 36 offers: whether CPR 36.17(4) was engaged where the claimant had succeeded at the liability trial and subsequently accepted more than his offer before the hearing of the quantum trial.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Thomas_v_Secretary_of_State_for_the_Home_Department_2026_Costs_LR_125_5583</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Thomas_v_Secretary_of_State_for_the_Home_Department_2026_Costs_LR_125_5583</guid><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 12:24:00 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: H (a Child) (Appeal: Costs) [2026] Costs LR 49</title><description>Costs in family proceedings: whether an appeal was a separate category of proceeding and not a “financial remedy proceeding” within the meaning of FPR 28.3, in which case the presumption of no order as to costs would not apply and the court’s discretion could be exercised under FPR 30.11.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Re_H_a_Child_Appeal_Costs_2026_Costs_LR_49_5582</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Re_H_a_Child_Appeal_Costs_2026_Costs_LR_49_5582</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 08:08:56 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Qatar Investment and Projects Development Holding Co and Another v Phoenix Ancient Art SA and Others [2026] Costs LR 33</title><description>Security for costs under CPR Part 25: factors to apply in considering whether to order security for costs of an appeal and the reasonableness of the costs of a one-day hearing for making the application.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Qatar_Investment_and_Projects_Development_Holding_Co_and_Another_v_Phoenix_Ancient_Art_SA_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_33_5581</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Qatar_Investment_and_Projects_Development_Holding_Co_and_Another_v_Phoenix_Ancient_Art_SA_and_Others_2026_Costs_LR_33_5581</guid><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 15:51:39 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Mazur and Another v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP and Others [2025] Costs LR 2007</title><description>Conducting litigation: whether an employee in a firm of solicitors undertaking the conduct of litigation under supervision of an authorised person was permitted to do so under the Legal Services Act 2007 without committing a criminal offence.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Mazur_and_Another_v_Charles_Russell_Speechlys_LLP_and_Others_2025_Costs_LR_2007_5580</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Mazur_and_Another_v_Charles_Russell_Speechlys_LLP_and_Others_2025_Costs_LR_2007_5580</guid><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 12:18:17 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>R (Bates) v Highbury Corner Magistrates’ Court and Another [2026] Costs LR 1</title><description>Judicial review; whether the High Court’s general discretion under s 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 to award inter partes costs applied to criminal judicial review proceedings.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/R_Bates_v_Highbury_Corner_Magistrates_Court_and_Another_2026_Costs_LR_1_5579</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/R_Bates_v_Highbury_Corner_Magistrates_Court_and_Another_2026_Costs_LR_1_5579</guid><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 02:55:17 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Bellhouse and Another v Zurich Insurance plc [2025] Costs LR 1915</title><description>Consequentials: appropriate costs order to make where the defence had not been struck out, but the conduct of the defendant had been out of the norm.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Bellhouse_and_Another_v_Zurich_Insurance_plc_2025_Costs_LR_1915_5578</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Bellhouse_and_Another_v_Zurich_Insurance_plc_2025_Costs_LR_1915_5578</guid><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 23:57:23 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>DSM IP Assets BV and Another v Algal Omega 3 Ltd and Another [2025] Costs LR 1885</title><description>Costs of action: deciding who was the successful party and entitled to the costs in a patent action relating to three patents.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/DSM_IP_Assets_BV_and_Another_v_Algal_Omega_3_Ltd_and_Another_2025_Costs_LR_1885_5577</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/DSM_IP_Assets_BV_and_Another_v_Algal_Omega_3_Ltd_and_Another_2025_Costs_LR_1885_5577</guid><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 15:35:46 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Santander UK plc v CCP Graduate School Ltd [2025] Costs LR 1867</title><description>Variation of a costs order: whether the court had jurisdiction to vary a costs order and to stay enforcement of an order for a payment on account pending appeal.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Santander_UK_plc_v_CCP_Graduate_School_Ltd_2025_Costs_LR_1867_5576</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Santander_UK_plc_v_CCP_Graduate_School_Ltd_2025_Costs_LR_1867_5576</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 22:57:15 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Mahmoud v Glanville and Another [2025] Costs LR 1831</title><description>Family law costs: factors to apply when deciding to make a costs order in proceedings involving children and in favour of a charity under s 194 of the Legal Services Act 2007.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Mahmoud_v_Glanville_and_Another_2025_Costs_LR_1831_5575</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Mahmoud_v_Glanville_and_Another_2025_Costs_LR_1831_5575</guid><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 22:44:19 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Cohen and Another v Co-operative Group Ltd and Others [2025] Costs LR 1853</title><description>Summary assessment: factors to apply where the hourly rates and the time spent by the paying party significantly exceeded that claimed by the receiving party.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Cohen_and_Another_v_Co_operative_Group_Ltd_and_Others_2025_Costs_LR_1853_5572</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Cohen_and_Another_v_Co_operative_Group_Ltd_and_Others_2025_Costs_LR_1853_5572</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 12:28:56 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Craft Development SCI v Actis LLP (a Firm) and Others [2025] Costs LR 1785</title><description>Security for costs: whether there had been a change of circumstance justifying a variation of earlier order for security under CPR Part 25.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Craft_Development_SCI_v_Actis_LLP_a_Firm_and_Others_2025_Costs_LR_1785_5574</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Craft_Development_SCI_v_Actis_LLP_a_Firm_and_Others_2025_Costs_LR_1785_5574</guid><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 22:54:15 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Tates (Agents) Ltd and Another v Nicholas and Another [2025] Costs LR 1813</title><description>Third party costs orders: the court could not make a costs order against a person who had never been a party to the principal claim in which the order had been made, nor given notice of the potential non-party costs order.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Tates_Agents_Ltd_and_Another_v_Nicholas_and_Another_2025_Costs_LR_1813_5573</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Tates_Agents_Ltd_and_Another_v_Nicholas_and_Another_2025_Costs_LR_1813_5573</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 23:04:40 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Malhotra Leisure Ltd v Aviva Insurance Ltd [2025] Costs LR 1771</title><description>Consequentials: whether the costs of action should be awarded on the indemnity basis, meaning that the last approved costs budget would be irrelevant at detailed assessment.</description><link>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Malhotra_Leisure_Ltd_v_Aviva_Insurance_Ltd_2025_Costs_LR_1771_5571</link><guid>https://costslawreports.co.uk/reports/Malhotra_Leisure_Ltd_v_Aviva_Insurance_Ltd_2025_Costs_LR_1771_5571</guid><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 14:34:32 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>